Showing posts with label Negotiating Power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Negotiating Power. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

Finding Balance

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Balanced Scorecards are ways of managing performance. They are particularly challenging in areas that are hard to quantify and articulate. A lot of my work for money involved taking technical concepts, trying to wrap my head around them, then trying to make them easier for others to wrap their head around. Understanding is incredibly hard to quantify. Trust even more so. It takes years to build, and can be broken in an instant. Particularly if you are looking for reasons or data points to not trust someone. Everyone is holey. Everyone is flawed. A bigger flaw is looking for holes in other people. To look for reasons to distrust. The problem with KPIs is the list gets long fast. So if a task (maintain trust) is “worth 2%” of a year’s assessment, the quantifying or checklist becomes a spurious form of false confidence. Easier is to have a list of things you won’t do. Even better is to have an incredibly short list (three key things), and to trust people. Trusting doesn’t mean being a sucker. You can build buffers, checks and balances. But it does mean accepting that not everything can be controlled or quantified. It does mean building systems that aren’t designed to cut people off like gangrenous limbs.


Monday, June 01, 2020

Consenting Adults

Some people like hierarchy. That’s okay. Everyone has their kinks, and anything that goes on between consenting adults is fine. It’s the consent part that bothers me. I believe in institution building, but I worry about the power of “legal people” over people. When the institution gets so big that the individuals become abstractions. Roles, categories, functions, grades. Turning people into numbers for memos to pass up to boardrooms. Particularly when the negotiating power is lopsided, and on one side there is a person “speaking for the institution” (be it a Country, Company or a The People). For markets and communities to function well, there has to be full transparency and a sense of peers working together. Otherwise it is just bullying. Using the fact that someone has limited job opportunities or capital to incentivise them to do as they are told. 

Need a Crown?

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Double Standards


Consistency is a great thinking tool. If you believe “A” and “not A”, you can’t believe them in the same room. I used to think you can’t be intelligent and racist. But then I read about Dr.Death. The cardiologist and former head of Apartheid South Africa’s chemical and biological warfare project. You can believe contradictory things if you switch off part of your brain. That is why Double Standards grate me so much. Business can encourage a brutal offswitch for seeing people as people. It can encourage “tough decisions” that impact people more than the business. Often those standards don’t work both ways. You don’t see people higher up the chain of command falling on their swords. When the numbers support the argument, they are used. When the numbers don’t support their argument, the Defence Attorney and Public Relations Officer replace the Scientist at the Q&A session. The business becomes a church. The danger with numbers, is there are always other numbers.