I don’t think we’re ever really having the same
conversation.
It’s like sitting in a theatre watching the same play but from different seats,
distracted by different things. Maybe you’re focusing on one actor, while I’m
captivated by the lighting.
Jonathan Haidt uses the metaphor of the rider and the
elephant. The elephant (our emotions, intuitions, and embodied experience) is
doing most of the habitual and automatic work. The rider (the conscious mind) tries
to explain it afterward.
Inside my head, it feels like there’s a committee in constant debate. Each
member has their own agenda, and their words float around, interrupting and
overlapping. When I speak, it’s not a clean stream of thought—it’s fragments
trying to make sense of each other. Dipping in and out of connection with my
elephant.
I don’t have access, but I am as sure as I can be that the same thing is
happening in your head.
So when we talk, it’s not just me talking to you, it’s my inner committee
talking to yours. No wonder we miss each other.
That’s why we need better tools for conversation. Tools like Interpretive
Charity, Transcription, Summarising, Questions, Reframing… and teasing out
meaning rather than thinking we can just force it on each other.
To truly hear.
To truly listen.
Because sometimes… we’re not even in the same conversation.
Truth is conversational.
No comments:
Post a Comment