Sunday, August 22, 2021
Stilling the Waves
Friday, August 20, 2021
Life is Complicated
Knowing the Game
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Learning to Sit
Thursday, August 12, 2021
Uncommonly Connected and Compounding
Thursday, July 15, 2021
Comfort in Discomfort
Wednesday, July 14, 2021
Expectation Management
Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Jonty Dive
Tuesday, July 06, 2021
That Map
Monday, July 05, 2021
Start with Conversation
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Lessons Learned
Looking back far enough, there are lots of examples of extreme events (high impact, low probability). Numbers we use for risk analysis make better questions than answers, because they never include the full picture. A great book to read to give you a little bit of humility is the story of Long-Term Capital Management, titled “When Genius Fails”. It is an important book to read for those who think they have cracked the code. Thinking in “distributions” (a range of possibility) rather than simple numbers is vital. Howard Marks implores that we, “always remember the six-foot man who drowned in a river that was five-foot deep on average”. It is not just the average that matters. The statistical term is moments. You have to think in moments. How the range of possibility is made up. That includes thinking about tail risk, and what isn’t in the numbers (yet). In scenario testing, you need to plan for what could happen, not just a single path. In the same way as looking at what did happen is not enough. What could have happened? You need to plan for your plan not covering everything. With hindsight, we think we understand the world. We think the lessons we learn through mistakes mean, “if I had done it this way, this is how it would have played out.” In reality, if you had the chance again, everything would be completely different.
Wednesday, November 18, 2020
Financial Calm
Wednesday, November 11, 2020
Adapt
Investment Analysts build models of businesses to help
understand complexity. The point of the model is not to be correct or not. You
know in advance that you cannot have an accurate map of the future.
Nature does not subscribe to the simple cause and effect story
that we use to try control the world. The point of any of the models in our
toolbox is simply to help us make sense of things in a human way. To add a
story. To add meaning. Like other tools we have made up – countries, words, money,
political parties, ideologies, agreements. They sit on top of reality to
process our controlled hallucination.
Personal Financial Plans are similar. They are not fixed in stone. They are not correct or wrong. They are an ongoing conversation. The only thing you can truly plan for is things not going according to plan. A good plan starts with a picture of where you are. Then builds towards capacity to adapt, adjust, and accommodate. As you change. As you live. As you add meaning.
Monday, October 19, 2020
False Gods
Money makes money. This allows wealth to compound (the growth also produces), if not everything that is produced is consumed. If some of the fruit is planted, and given the space to grow. This is both powerful and dangerous. Ideally, you want to fail hard and memorably early on, to knock the delusions of grandeur out of you. You do not want to be that false god who complains that the (clean and comfortable) guest room is not up to the standards to which they are accustomed. Because if you do not regularly suffer some misfortune, chances are life will one day smack you hard and repeatedly in the face. Probably when you are managing other peoples’ money. As Mike Tyson said, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth”. You cannot just judge yourself on how your path has played out. You cannot judge others without looking in a mirror and reflecting on your potential unwalked paths. We are communal animals, and every path is an alternative reality. One you could have easily been on. The key is not profit making and ego building. It is reinvestment, and building buffers and capacity for whatever punches are thrown.
Friday, July 31, 2020
Fist to Mouth
Creative Destruction dismantles long standing ways of doing things in order to make way for innovation. It scales the idea of “making yourself redundant”. There is a punch you in the face obvious problem with making yourself redundant. It requires trust. Fool me once, shame on you style. When you realise that someone has the ability to cut you loose like a gangrenous limb, after solving their problem, one option is to make yourself irreplaceable. To stop trusting. To create artificial barriers to entry and negotiating power. Little secrets people don’t want known. Stuff they know you know they wouldn’t want in the newspaper. Dirt. The only way to truly want creative destruction is to be an owner. Then, and only then, do you have an incentive for the problem to be solved. Otherwise, the real incentive is to make sure you, personally, are a part of the problem solving. You want the problems to go on. To release the power of creative destruction, we have to detach our identities from problems. To build buffers of cash, and engines of capital, that support us beyond hand to mouth living. That make us celebrate a job no longer being necessary, because it means a problem has been sustainably solved.