Charl Langeveldt recently bowled another hatrick... I was lucky enough to see the one he bowled when the West Indies needed 2 runs to beat us with 3 wickets in hand.
The comparison is week, but normally people only starting talking about a hatrick when someone takes two wickets in a row. With batting, you hesitantly start saying, maybe 6 in a row, when someone gets to 3 or 4.
So...
Why was everyone talking of Tiger winning 4 majors this year before he had even won the first one?
Look, I am a bit of a hypocrit since I was kind of hoping Roger would win all 4 this year, and also got upset when he missed the Australian Open. But somehow, since he has done 3 a year for the last few years, that seemed more reasonable?
No comments:
Post a Comment